[OpenAFS] Future of AFS? Interesting Ideas!?

[Benjamin Rodewald]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 25 December 2002 16:09, Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
> --On Wednesday, December 25, 2002 12:24:29 +0100 Turbo Fredriksson
>

> If your problem is with the documentation, then join the club. This
> documentation is being distributed because it's much better than
> nothing at all, and the documentation effort is having problems
> getting people involved (imagine that) ,not to mention that it will
> have to start almost from scratch, since the source for the IBM
> documentation apparently cannot be found)
>
> > but this should be the case with the (ubik)(?). I (want) LDAP, so
> > I'd like the possibility to do this...
>
> LDAP is a whole other problem.
>
> pts isn't a directory service
>

Join the club?
I am interested in evaluating things and finding solutions for afs with k=
rb5=20
(let`s say MIT) for example.=20
I am also interested in documenting single sign-on solutions based on krb=
5 and=20
nss/pam-ldap.

Maybe one shouldn`t try to solve problems in AFS as first step, but try t=
o do=20
documentation of existing solutions people already use in big and stable=20
environments?!?!

IMHO Openafs with krb4 is a solution for nothing but AFS!

Regards,
Benjamin

- --=20
Benjamin Rodewald
 linuxfriendly.de - penguin empowered
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+CgQ2Fl/Puxw3Zo0RAsDxAJ9Rgl8LlThNLtSoj+XMdHY1rarCMQCfQYFy
oC0xD8Mltn//UvLs3wtaYMw=3D
=3DKyd/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----