[OpenAFS] Future of AFS? Interesting Ideas!?

[chas williams]

In message <87vg1i1guq.fsf@papadoc.bayour.com>,Turbo Fredriksson writes:
>the AFS people are removing Kerberos 4 from OpenAFS, but this should be
>the case with the ubick (?). I wan't LDAP, so I'd like the possibility to
>do this...

actually does a bit more than just hold the user/group information.  it
also stores the volume information.  you could replace it but you would
need to provide the same features, primarily the quorum mechanism.