[OpenAFS] Solaris 9 issues - making some progress

[Dale Ghent]

On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:32 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:

> On Aug 13, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>> Have you (or anyone else) compiled all of OpenAFS on a system with
>> this patch? If AFS was using any of the changed fields, it should
>> get a compile error.
>
> Yes, there are a few ifdef blocks in src/vfsck/setup.c which reference 
> fs_interleave. This did of course produce compile errors. I'm going to 
> try re-working the code a bit to account for fs_si and see what 
> happens.

Ok, it seems fs_si is a member that provides status for Solaris Live 
Update (lufs) and from the looks of it, can largely be ignored. 
fs_interleave is some hold-over from BSD 4.3 days and I guess Sun is 
using these old rotational positioning parameters as placeholders for 
modern stuff.

/dale