[OpenAFS] Dear Transarc, I Quit! Love, Moose
Esther Filderman
ecf@psc.edu
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:43:08 -0500
For those of you who have laughed at me because my servers were not
running OpenAFS.
the short story, because I tend to babble:
By the time IBM acknowledged the 2^30 problem, the PSC's AFS servers
were running OpenAFS 1.2.11, "upgraded" from Transarc 3.5.
the longer story:
Until today, the AFS servers at the PSC ran Transarc 3.5, patch
{mumble}. I never put 3.6 on them, for some bizarre reason I can't
recall anymore. For months, I've wanted to install OpenAFS on them,
but due to politics, couldn't do so without bringing up a "test cell"
to prove that it would all work easily. I was supposed to get that
cell running over break, but got sick instead.
Being part of CMU, I get to talk online with folks at CMU and MIT
using zephyr, MIT's magical communication toy. When I left the house
at 8:30am, some MIT folk were crowing about "Happy New Bit Day" and
the whole 2^30 thing.
When I got back to the house at 11 am, Jeff Hutzleman says:
Hey, moose.. You want to upgrade your dbservers soon.
I suggest a couple of hours ago.
First I tried patching and recompiling the Transarc 3.5 source.
Everyone who's ever done this, who is NOT an ex-ITC or -Transarc
employee, and has not bled from both eyes, please raise your hand.
By 2:30pm my servers were happily running OpenAFS 1.2.11.
We're still running a few IBM-AFS clients here and there, but now
we're almost completely an OpenAFS shop.
----------------------------------------------------------------
ecf@psc.edu Esther Filderman moose+@cmu.edu
Senior System Mangler & AFS Dominatrix
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center