[OpenAFS] RE: [OpenAFS-Doc] Apologies about documentation mess

[ted creedon]

We need a standardized "test set" for AFS that can be run on all the
platforms.

All in good time.

Are there any possible configuration errors that could be causing this
problem?

ted

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Altman [mailto:jaltman@columbia.edu] 
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 7:45 AM
To: ted creedon
Cc: 'chas williams - CONTRACTOR'; openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RE: [OpenAFS-Doc] Apologies about documentation mess

Ted:

You are going to be waiting a long time.  I'm not going to have time to get
AFS running on my AIBO until sometime next year at the earliest.

Jeffrey Altman


ted creedon wrote:

> All of them.
> Period.
> 
> tedc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chas williams - CONTRACTOR [mailto:chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 7:29 AM
> To: ted creedon
> Cc: 'renato arruda'; openafs-doc@openafs.org; openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RE: [OpenAFS-Doc] Apologies about documentation 
> mess
> 
> In message <20050819140356.24C2AB029@smtpauth.easystreet.com>,"ted
creedon"
> wri
> tes:
> 
>>Since the latest version of AFS doesn't work at all here, I doubt that 
>>any further documentation effort is warranted until AFS passes 
>>rudimentary Linux stress testing.
> 
> 
> it may come as a shock that there are other platforms besides Linux.
> how many platforms need to be stable for you to continue with the 
> documentation?
> 
> further, "what use is a baby?"
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info