*** Spam *** [OpenAFS] Why Arla?

[Kim Kimball]

When AFS was still solely a proprietary product of Transarc/IBM there 
was no open source.

Arla was implementing at least the AFS client when no client source was 
openly available.

I expect there's more going on, and don't know what the differences in 
focus are right now.



Leroy Tennison wrote:
> I noticed a link to Arla on the website.  Going to it, I see 
> references to an apparently different open source implementation of 
> afs.  What I didn't see was an explanation of their reason for 
> existence separate from OpenAFS.  Can anyone explain to me how they 
> are different?  Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info