[OpenAFS] naive questions about openafs

[Guillaume Rousse]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> 
>>BTW, I could be wrong, but I don't really see kernel-tree-specific 
>>options in the generated makefile, apart build directory pathes that 
>>could get easily made relatives. I tested against two different 2.6 
> 
> 
> The potential for differences exists as the kernel can change significantly
> between minor releases.
The point is: how would it change, otherwise as inside the source code ?

If I ship a directory containing the following:
- the attached generated Makefile
- all .c files corresponding to the .o files inside
- the generated AFS_component_version_number.c file
- all referenced .h files

Would it be enough for building against any 2.6 kernel tree ?
-- 
Anything the Army says is man-portable, isn't
		-- Murphy's New Military Laws n°15