[OpenAFS] Re: why afs backup is so poorly supported

Adam Megacz megacz@cs.berkeley.edu
Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:44:22 -0700


> AFS traditionally doesn't "replace" a filesystem, it "augments" it.

Well, it sort of does a bit of both.  I wish it did a bit less of the
former.

> And then, well, zfs would be pretty nifty for AFS.

You're not the only one drooling over this possibility.  But it won't
help much with the current namei/AFSIDat layout.

  - a

-- 
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770  B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380