[OpenAFS] Re: why afs backup is so poorly supported
Adam Megacz
megacz@cs.berkeley.edu
Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:44:22 -0700
> AFS traditionally doesn't "replace" a filesystem, it "augments" it.
Well, it sort of does a bit of both. I wish it did a bit less of the
former.
> And then, well, zfs would be pretty nifty for AFS.
You're not the only one drooling over this possibility. But it won't
help much with the current namei/AFSIDat layout.
- a
--
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380