[OpenAFS] Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: patch: make jafs work again (at least the libadmin portion)

Derrick Brashear shadow@gmail.com
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:36:52 -0500


------=_Part_12520_5468063.1197920212793
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Dec 17, 2007 1:34 PM, Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

>
> Matt Benjamin <matt@linuxbox.com> writes:
> > I have wondered whether either is necessary.  For most operations,
> > libadmin doesn't need a kernel.
>
> Sure, but AFAIK it is the only way to get programmatic access to the
> "fs" command suite (like "fs la").  The two near-term projects I'm
> interested in using this for are:
>
>  - "transitive fs la" and some other ACL-troubleshooting tools for
>    novices
>

 Technically, you *could* provide a mini-(dummy)-cache-manager in an
fs-workalike that meant you could just make RPCs directly from it with no
kernel.

I think Chaskiel already has all the code for this in some variant of afscp.

------=_Part_12520_5468063.1197920212793
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 17, 2007 1:34 PM, Adam Megacz &lt;<a href="mailto:megacz@cs.berkeley.edu">megacz@cs.berkeley.edu</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Matt Benjamin &lt;<a href="mailto:matt@linuxbox.com">matt@linuxbox.com</a>&gt; writes:<br>&gt; I have wondered whether either is necessary. &nbsp;For most operations,<br>&gt; libadmin doesn&#39;t need a kernel.<br><br>Sure, but AFAIK it is the only way to get programmatic access to the
<br>&quot;fs&quot; command suite (like &quot;fs la&quot;). &nbsp;The two near-term projects I&#39;m<br>interested in using this for are:<br><br> &nbsp;- &quot;transitive fs la&quot; and some other ACL-troubleshooting tools for<br> &nbsp; &nbsp;novices
<br></blockquote><div><br>&nbsp;Technically, you *could* provide a mini-(dummy)-cache-manager in an fs-workalike that meant you could just make RPCs directly from it with no kernel.<br><br>I think Chaskiel already has all the code for this in some variant of afscp.
<br><br></div></div><br>

------=_Part_12520_5468063.1197920212793--