[AFS3-std] AFS Standardisation

[Jake Thebault-Spieker]

>
> Am I the only one who has been finding this too damn complicated?
>
> My suggestion: Every time we need to standardize something in AFS, we
> lock the Jeffs, Derrick, and Russ in a room.  Anyone who objects to this
> process gets locked in the room with them.  No one is allowed to leave
> the room until the appropriate document is completed.  We can call this
> the "Steel Cage Match" process.
>

This might be a good plan, until we have a freak accident wherein a city bus
somehow finds itself launched into the room, and there are no survivors.


> The Registrars are specified in the proposal as:
> "The registrars would be initially comprised of the current registrar,
> plus a representative from each of the currently available AFS
> implementations (IBM, OpenAFS, kAFS and Arla)"
>

Actually, valid point raised above. Suppose there aren't representatives
available/willing/able to represent one or more of the current AFS
implementations?
-- 
Jacob Thebault-Spieker
Cell: (320) 288-6412
http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/archives/afs3-standardization/attachments/20080820/73c541eb/attachment.htm