[AFS3-std] Second Draft of Standardisation Document

[Russ Allbery]

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> writes:

> Which headers?  All the headers?  All headers except trace headers?
> This matters, because when the process is running normally, there are
> multiple vote-takers each of whom receive a copy of the message, and
> they must be able to independently arrive at the same result.

Also, what transformation format of the body of the message?  It's a good
idea, but it turns out that canonical forms of e-mail messages are a
horribly sticky problem (see the long history of various standards for
signing e-mail messages).

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>