[AFS3-std] extended callback cancellation, please discuss

[Jeffrey Hutzelman]

--On Tuesday, May 06, 2008 02:04:52 PM -0400 Matt Benjamin 
<matt@linuxbox.com> wrote:

> My current draft has a bunch of motivation for doing all this in the
> first place, but if it's not viewed as important (perhaps because
> there's consensus there),

Motivation is a suitable topic for such a document.  Further, if there is 
consensus on something, removing it for that reason sort of misses the 
point.


> I have been trying to get point feedback so what is proposed in the
> draft reflects intuitions of people I know have ideas and usually share
> them--not short circuit the opportunity for others to comment.

That's fine, but bear in mind that more frequent drafts often promote 
discussion more effectively than trying to get everything right in the 
first draft.  I've seen IETF documents go through dozens of drafts before 
being done.  Of course, those generally have more contributors than I think 
we have here.

-- Jeff