[AFS3-std] Second Draft of Standardisation Document

[Jeffrey Hutzelman]

--On Thursday, September 04, 2008 05:50:02 PM +0100 Simon Wilkinson 
<simon@sxw.org.uk> wrote:

>
> On 29 Aug 2008, at 20:17, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>> I think it is fine to designate the vote-taker(s) as breaking the
>> tie in the event there is no returning chair.
>>
>> Separately, if we are going to give anyone a casting vote, we need
>> to be clear as to whether they also hold a normal vote.
>
> I'd say that the vote-taker(s) as a body have a single casting vote. Each
> vote taker individually may hold a normal vote, in the same way as any
> other voter.

Works for me.

-- Jeff