[AFS3-std] Re: Review/Comments Extended Callback Information Draft

[Jeffrey Hutzelman]

--On Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:51:53 PM -0400 "Matt W. Benjamin" 
<matt@linuxbox.com> wrote:

> Yes, there are RPC refresh dependencies.  I don't believe any is a
> blocker for consensus, however, as evidenced by the request from the
> hackathon to proceed.

It's not a blocker for "we think this is a good idea".
However, to publish a specification, we must reach rough consensus on that 
specification, including all of the details.  We can't leave things to be 
"filled in later"; once we approve a document, there is no later.

-- Jeff