[AFS3-std] Re: AFS and 'afs' URI scheme

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev]

01.04.2011 10:42, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:42 +0300, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>
>> The current WG does not work on particular schemes definitions.  It is
>> chartered to update procedures for their regsitrations.
> To be clear -- there is no "involved WG".  In the few cases where
> existing URI schemes have been reclassified of late, the documents in
> question have been individual submissions to the IETF, and have been
> discussed on the uri-review list, which is a non-WG list chartered to
> review new URI scheme proposals, and on uri@w3.org.
>
>> In order to give the scheme even Provisional regsitration, we should
>> decide on uniformed syntax, first of all.
> Actually, no.  The scheme is in the Provisional table now.  In order to
> change this, you need to develop a consensus, which you have clearly
> failed to do, both here and on uri-review.
So, as I understand, there is a consensus currently to leave this "as 
is" and wait for future definition of 'afs' scheme.

Mykyta
> -- Jeff
>
>