[AFS3-std] Re: AFS-3 XDR discriminated union primitive type I-D

[Andrew Deason]

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:28:52 -0400
Tom Keiser <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> wrote:

> Additionally, IMHO, this is merely a coupling at the namespace level:
> nothing precludes us from adding rx-union XDR routines to any
> arbitrary RPC framework.

Yes, just call it something else. I can come up with a bunch of
suggestions (and I think there have been several on list), but it helps
to have one, so: inline-union? A la BulkStatus vs InlineBulkStatus...

-- 
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net