[AFS3-std] Re: AFS-3 XDR discriminated union primitive type I-D

Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:59:05 -0400 (EDT)

extensible-union sounds reasonable.

Matt

----- "Tom Keiser" <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Matt W. Benjamin <matt@linuxbox.com>
> wrote:
> > I had thought of safe-union and guarded-union, I wasn't in love with
> these.
> >
> 
> "extensible-union"?  I could go for "safe-union", but (imho) it has
> some negative subtext with respect to rfc 4506, which is probably not
> what we want...
> 
> -Tom

-- 

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309