[AFS3-std] Submitting a draft RFC as Experimental

[Douglas E. Engert]

Jeff Hutzelman,
I missed your mail from Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:45:49 -0500
where you said:

 > Yeah; someone is going to need to have a conversation with the
 > RSE and ISE about our wanting to use the RFC Series as the
 > publication of record for our standards.

I would suggest that someone who is very active in the IETF and
understands the processes better then I would be preferred.
Any volunteers?


On 1/12/2011 2:27 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>
> On 1/12/2011 11:54 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>> On 1/12/2011 12:39 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>>> The way I am reading draft-wilkinison-afs3-standardisation-00 Section
>>> 2.3.3, the pts draft should be moved to experimental, which would require
>>> the author to add the explanation and submit it to the RFC editors
>>> as experimental.
>
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html
> Says:
> The desired category (Informational or Experimental) of the RFC.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt
> Says:
> Indicating what intended status the I-D if it is published as
> an RFC is fine; however, this should be done with the words
> "Intended status: <status>" on the left side of the first page.
>
> I am not sure if "desired category" == "Intended status".
>
>  From draft-wilkinison-afs3-standardisation-00 Section 2.3.3 it looks
> like we intend to keep documents as "draft", "experimental" or "standard".
> We can keep track of our status using the "Intended status: field,
> as it appears that independent submissions are in the eyes of the editor
> draft for now.
>
> Derrick,
> Can you add the explanation, and the "Intended status: experimental"
> and resubmit the draft?
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html says you send an e-mail
> which could include the fact that this committee has reviewed the draft
> and is moving it to experimental.
>
> When you submitted it the first time, did you include any reviewers?
> If needed we have a couple of IETF WG chairs on this list, they could
> be added...
>
> Did I miss anything?
>

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <DEEngert@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444