[AFS3-std] A call for consensus on draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02

[Simon Wilkinson]

Sorry, this slipped under my radar.

The latest draft of this addresses all of my earlier concerns, and as such I=
 support its publication.

S.

On 26 Jul 2011, at 14:25, "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov> wrote:

> This call for consensus was to extend to 7/25 yesterday.
> So far I have only seen 2 "OK" responses from Derrick Brashear
> and David Boyes, and a "why are we doing this" from an outsider.
>=20
> In the view of this chair, that does not constitute a consensus,
> and I will extend the call till Friday 7/29.
>=20
>=20
> On 7/15/2011 1:11 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
>>=20
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/
>>=20
>>=20
>> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
>> and this being Friday afternoon, I would like to extend the
>> period to Monday, 7/25/2011.
>>=20
>>=20
>> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
>> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
>> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
>> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
>> the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
>>=20
>> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
>> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
>> us know that too.
>>=20
>> Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
>>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> Douglas E. Engert  <DEEngert@anl.gov>
> Argonne National Laboratory
> 9700 South Cass Avenue
> Argonne, Illinois  60439
> (630) 252-5444
> _______________________________________________
> AFS3-standardization mailing list
> AFS3-standardization@openafs.org
> http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization