[AFS3-std] draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names to Experimental

[Tom Keiser]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Simon Wilkinson <simon@sxw.org.uk> wrote:
> Sorry Tom, but this ship has sailed. We had a consensus call, and agreed to advance the draft. In theory this means that the registrars have assigned code points for the versions of the RPCs contained in the document we declared done.
>

So, what are we going to do about the GetCapabilities issue?  A
compliant implementation could cache this data forever, which
is.....preposterous.  Can we can handle this via the RFC errata
process?

-Tom