[AFS3-std] Re: New version of the 64-bit time I-D (-03)

[Andrew Deason]

On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:06:07 -0500
Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net> wrote:

> At the end of the day, they're just names so it doesn't matter very
> much. But the draft as it stands right now is very AFS-centric and
> contains a lot of discussion of AFS-only issues, so changing that while
> still having the draft make sense seems nontrivial.

So... was all of this a satisfactory answer? Or do we need to discuss
name changes and making this appropriate for lower layers?

-- 
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net