[AFS3-std] afs3-rxgk-updates for 03

[Simon Wilkinson]

On 7 Nov 2012, at 00:41, Andrew Deason wrote:
> I would have thought that a BIND connection could possibly allow
> hijacking while still providing other security requirements (like
> CLEAR). That would mean a BIND connection may or may not be allowable
> here, depending on the underlying layer, which is why the reason for =
the
> level requirement should perhaps be mentioned.

Given the lack of clear specification for the BIND level, I wonder if we =
should just remove it from this specification. If and when we find a =
need for it, we can write a new spec which covers all of these issues.

Cheers,

Simon