[AFS3-std] rxgk/rxgk-afs updates

[Simon Wilkinson]

On 6 Mar 2013, at 21:33, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>=20
>> Still awaiting input here.

I would be inclined to remove the text entirely, and leave it up to =
implementors. Whilst I don't think there's any case in which rxgk-afs =
should be accepting arbitrary acceptor names, there are situations where =
it may be appropriate to do so when we're doing per-server negotiation.

> We also should specify a name type to be used when importing the =
principal name afs-rxgk@_afs.<cellname>, presumably =
GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE.

Yes.

Cheers,

Simon