[OpenAFS-devel] RE: OpenAFS CVS Commit: openafs/src/cf by shadow
Neulinger, Nathan
nneul@umr.edu
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:55:06 -0500
Seems to me that the only time the size actually matters is when allocating
the vnode.
Why not just:
typedef struct inode vnode_t;
and then special case where vnode's are allocated to allocate a minimal size
of the inode (i.e. sizeof(struct inode)-sizeof(someinode.u)), or something
like that.
Alternatively, adding perl as a build dependency on linux would make it
relatively easy to autogenerate the struct vnode definition.
-- Nathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cvs@GRAND.CENTRAL.ORG [mailto:cvs@GRAND.CENTRAL.ORG]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:32 PM
> To: openafs-cvs@GRAND.CENTRAL.ORG
> Subject: OpenAFS CVS Commit: openafs/src/cf by shadow
>
>
> Update of /cvs/openafs/src/cf
> In directory GRAND.CENTRAL.ORG:/data/sb/openafs/src/cf
>
> Modified Files:
> linux-test4.m4
> Log Message:
> DELTA linux24-another-new-inode-field-sigh-20011001
> AUTHOR eichin-oa@boxedpenguin.com
>
> with configure glue by shadow@dementia.org
>
> one of these days we really need to implement a better solution
>
>
> --- DELTA config follows ---
> linux24-another-new-inode-field-sigh-20011001
> openafs/src/cf/linux-test4.m4 1.6 1.7
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-cvs mailing list
> OpenAFS-cvs@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-cvs
>