[OpenAFS-devel] Re: [PATCH] PAG support, try #2

Matthew Wilcox willy@debian.org
Wed, 14 May 2003 12:49:53 +0100


On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:43:31AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> +typedef int		__kernel_pag_t;

> +typedef __kernel_pag_t		pag_t;

> +static pag_t vfs_pag_next = 1;

> +	vfspag->pag = vfs_pag_next++;
> +	if (vfspag->pag < 1)
> +		vfspag->pag = 1;

Is there a reason pag_t isn't an unsigned int?  Seems to me you'll have
2^31 good times followed by 2^31 bad times.  Also, isn't signed overflow
one of these undefined things?  I wouldn't mention it except that gcc
seem to be more and more fond of obeying the letter of the standard
rather than doing useful stuff.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk