[OpenAFS-devel] pagsh in krbafs vs openafs

[Russ Allbery]

Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net> writes:

> should /usr/bin/pagsh and /usr/share/man/man1/pagsh.1.gz from
> openafs-client be renamed so they don't clash with krbafs-utils on
> Fedora/RHEL?

You should stop using krbafs-utils and switch to Kerberos v5.

Debian handles this problem through alternatives, which is the right
solution short of getting rid of all the old K4 stuff.  I don't think the
pagsh in OpenAFS should be renamed, given that it's the arguably canonical
version.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>