[OpenAFS-devel] getcwd() on Linux 2.6.18+OpenAFS 1.4.2
bugs/errors.
Michael Loftis
mloftis@wgops.com
Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:27:01 -0700
--On November 8, 2007 3:46:16 PM -0800 Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
wrote:
> Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu> writes:
>
>> It sounds like what you want is for the kernel to keep track not only of
>> the files and directories you have open, but the paths by which you got
>> to them. Not impossible, but I think it would require changes to the
>> kernel outside afs. And it would change the semantics of the file
>> system.
>
>> I'll admit that what you've seen can be surprising. That's why most
>> file systems prohibit loops. It would be nice if afs could do this but
>> it would be hard to implement. And if we did, you would lose your
>> /afs/mw shortcut.
>
> The issue is with multiple paths to the same directory, which doesn't
> require a loop.
Well I can certainly use it to traverse into that other users homedir,
tokens permitting when getcwd is returning the longer/incorrect path for
var...
EG:
(chrooted into ...u/m/mloftis)
updog:/# ls -la
ls: .yesterday: Connection timed out
total 234
drwxrwxrwx 15 mloftis mloftis 2048 Nov 8 17:00 .
drwxrwxrwx 15 mloftis mloftis 2048 Nov 8 17:00 ..
-rw-rw-rw- 1 mloftis 501 82 Jun 20 21:03 ._skelloutscript
-rw-rw-rw- 1 1 501 82 Jul 20 16:40 ._staff_afs.txt
drwx------ 2 mloftis mloftis 2048 Jul 24 14:46 .aptitude
........
updog:/# cd var
updog:/var# /bin/pwd
/afs/modwest.com/u/j/jslife/var
updog:/var# ls -la tsets/
total 92
drwxrwxrwx 8 3680 3685 2048 Nov 8 12:53 .
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 43008 Jul 30 16:54 ..
drwx------ 2 3680 36805 2048 Oct 9 15:32 .aptitude
-rw------- 1 3680 36805 2080 Oct 5 10:01 .bash_history
-rw-r--r-- 1 3680 3685 220 May 25 12:54 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r-- 1 3680 3685 414 May 25 12:54 .bash_profile
-rw-r--r-- 1 3680 3685 2224 Oct 5 09:58 .bashrc
drwx------ 2 3680 36805 2048 Oct 5 11:48 .gnupg
......
updog:/var# stat tsets
File: "tsets" -> "../"
Size: 3 Blocks: 2 IO Block: 4096 Symbolic Link
Device: 13h/19d Inode: 15339296 Links: 1
......
>
> Does the same problem happen with bind mounts? And if not, can we use
> whatever solution was used for bind mounts to fix this problem?
>
> --
> Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>
--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler