[OpenAFS-devel] Re: Solaris 10 predicament update

[Matt Kolb]

 > FWIW, I've committed my own time and  work towards this method since
 > we could also see at least a slight performance increase over current
 > code because we're not walking interface lists for every packet.
 >
 > So, the ioctl method I described, and the worker thread is actually a
 > Solaris task queue. See the ddi_taskq_create man page for details on
 > that.
 >
 > So far, my implementation uses Public interfaces. I'm desperately
 > trying to keep away from Solaris's, err, Privates.

Dale,

Is this something that will go into the maintenance release?  What's  
the best way to track your changes?  CVS?  Which branch?  Do I sound  
excited? ;)

Thanks,

./mk
-- 
Matt Kolb  <mk@msu.edu>
Academic Computing & Network Services
Michigan State University