[OpenAFS-devel] Re: [OpenAFS] Thinking about 1.6

[Russ Allbery]

"Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com> writes:

> I do think that we need to avoid assuming lack of clamor for some
> feature means folks don't think it's important.  I haven't seen
> benchmarks on pthreaded ubik--but from intuition, I intuit we would, at
> any rate.

I want pthreaded Ubik because I want to kill LWP on platforms that have
pthreads, which would simplify our library situation considerably.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>