[OpenAFS-devel] openafs 1.5 HP-UX question

Derrick Brashear shadow@gmail.com
Mon, 11 May 2009 15:59:15 -0400


> So I hope the interesting question here is what *should* be in there,
> if anything.

The real revision would be 75.xx; some evidence suggests 75.20.

>=A0If the kludge isn't necessary can we just pull it?

If you have an old pxdb, apparently it's necessary. The real question
is, should we support that, or tell people to just upgrade their
compiler suites?