[OpenAFS-devel] Re: IPv6 strawman plan: Re: Moving Forwards

[Garrett Wollman]

<<On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:08:13 -0500, Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net> said:

> But anyway, what I was trying to talk about is a case where a particular
> protocol is never standardized (at least, not intended to be, at least,
> not in the short term). You can request a bunch of code points for
> 'private/experimental' use, and then never tell anyone what they do.

> So, Jeff is just saying, yes, that is following the "process". As in,
> that is playing by the rules.

You're write, I misparsed what Jeffrey wrote.  (I was reading
"following" as 'sequential', not 'adhering to'.)  Never mind.

-GAWollman