[OpenAFS-devel] Re: Announce: TFS fork of OpenAFS for ipv6 and
rxgk implementation testing
Troy Benjegerdes
hozer@hozed.org
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:54:18 -0500
I prefer working with mercurial, and the conversions back and forth
seem pretty trivial. https://github.com/b4winckler/vim/wiki
(FYI, the following debian packages are quite helpful)
ii mercurial 2.2.2-1~bpo60+1 easy-to-use, scalable distributed version control system
ii mercurial-common 2.2.2-1~bpo60+1 easy-to-use, scalable distributed version control system (common files)
ii mercurial-git 0.3.1-1~bpo60+1 Git plugin for Mercurial
If you have something you think is appropriate for this tree that's
in Git that's not appropriate for the main OpenAFS mirror, please
send me a pack or whatever the git terminology of the changeset
is and I'll make sure it's in my tree.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:04:53PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:29:08 -0500
> Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> wrote:
>
> > https://bitbucket.org/dahozer/tfs
>
> Was it really necessary to switch the codebase to mercurial? bitbucket
> supports git, and an OpenAFS mirror already exists at github that
> probably would have been easier to copy/fork.
>