[OpenAFS-devel] Cache corruption with RX busy code

[Matt W. Benjamin]

What is the scope of the proposed invalidation?

----- "Simon Wilkinson" <simonxwilkinson@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> The critical thing is that we should be invalidating the cache
> whenever an RPC that changes server state is failed due to a timeout.
> We've already discussed adding this behaviour to deal with the idle
> dead mess - we just need to add it elsewhere.
> 
> Then, there is an additional question - is the hit you take from cache
> invalidation worth terminating a call for? That's going to be a trade
> off, but I suspect that the current behaviour just doesn't allow a
> server enough time to tidy up.
> 

-- 
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel.  734-761-4689 
fax.  734-769-8938 
cel.  734-216-5309