[OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Documetation for asetkey and aklog

[Esther Filderman]

The html that the latex is putting out is not very clean.  I'm looking
at DocBook [or will finish doing so once my dead AFS server is revived
-- oh the irony!] as a possibilty.  If it passes muster [mainly, can
it put out clean output AND be easy enough to use] I'll look into
converting your Latex into DocBook.

If it's evil, we may stick with Latex.


On 7/8/05, ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com> wrote:
> 1. Yes.
> 2. He doesn't have time.
> 3. It can be in html and pdf.
> 4. Its more readable than before. The index is very helpful.
> 5. It took 1 hour to convert.
> 6. What is the documentation plan for the 1.4 release?
>=20
> tedc
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Esther Filderman [mailto:mizmoose@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:35 AM
> To: ted creedon
> Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org; openafs-doc@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Documetation for asetkey and aklog
>=20
> Did you even ask Ken first before mucking with his file(s)?
>=20
> Please do not latex-ify the AFS FAQ.
>=20
> e.
>=20
>=20
> On 7/8/05, ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ken Hornstein's FAQ is now in Latex format. Perhaps an update would be
> > in order for 1.4?
> >
> > Obsolete docs and links are a real problem.
> >
> > tedc
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>