[OpenAFS-Doc] another mini-project: ensure man1, man5, and man8 are correct

Steven Jenkins steven.jenkins@gmail.com
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:18:42 -0400


------=_Part_31681_4808629.1181189922338
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/7/07, Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> ...




  But it's not a
> strong opinion and I could be convinced otherwise.
>

I, too, could be convinced either way on moving/splitting/leaving alone.

However, a section in the README documenting the existing rationale would be
most helpful.  (e.g., cut and paste your comments and put them into the
README.

Steven

------=_Part_31681_4808629.1181189922338
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Russ Allbery</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:rra@stanford.edu">rra@stanford.edu</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
...</blockquote><div><br>&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">&nbsp; But it&#39;s not a<br>strong opinion and I could be convinced otherwise.
<br></blockquote></div><br>I, too, could be convinced either way on moving/splitting/leaving alone.<br><br>However, a section in the README documenting the existing rationale would be most helpful.&nbsp; (e.g., cut and paste your comments and put them into the README.
<br><br>Steven<br><br>

------=_Part_31681_4808629.1181189922338--