[OpenAFS] ext[23] "testing" (was "Re: Unclean shutdown: AFS client ate my
filesystem (ext3)")
Rudolph T Maceyko
rtm@cert.org
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:56:58 -0400
OK, this is beginning to sound like superstition. We've been using
ext3 cache partitions for quite a while now with no ill effects...
--On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 09:45:06 -0400 Derek Atkins
<warlord@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> This is why the recommendation is two fold:
> 1) use ext2.
> 2) use a separate cache partition.
>
> #1 is because it's been tested and known to work
What extra "testing" has been done for ext2 that has not been done for
ext3?
Rudy