[OpenAFS] underlying FS type?

[Derrick J Brashear]

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Hartmut Reuter wrote:

> 
> > Reiserfs worked fine with cache partition on 2.2.x linux, but not on
> > 2.4. There have been reports of XFS problems with cache partition on
> > 2.4.x.
> 
> We never saw any problem with reiserfs under 2.4 on our vice-partitions.
> We are running SuSE 7.3 with 2.4.10 kernel and use reiserfs with large
> file support (because these are MR-AFS servers).

Vice partitions, not cache partitions.