[OpenAFS] Solaris 9 issues - making some progress
Renata Maria Dart
Renata Maria Dart <email@example.com>
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Hi, I see the same thing on our servers...on the servers where
vfsck is behaving correctly, we have kernel patch 112233-12 with
113073-05 installed. Our one server which is exhibiting the vfsck
errors has kernel 117171-05 with 113073-13.
>Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
>From: Dale Ghent <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Solaris 9 issues - making some progress
>To: "Douglas E. Engert" <email@example.com>
>X-Processed-By: MilterMonkey Version 0.9 --
>List-Id: OpenAFS Info/Discussion <openafs-info.openafs.org>
>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:50:16 -0400
>X-PMX-Version: 126.96.36.199272, Antispam-Core: 188.8.131.52808, Antispam-Data:
>On Aug 13, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> Do you have a diff of the old and new header files?
>> I have patch 112233-12 on my Solaris 9 workstation, but the AFS servers
>> are running with 112233-11 The files are identical.
>You know, this got me thinking, and did some digging around.
>I just went through all of the Solaris 9 UFS and kernel patches, and
>discovered two patches, 113457 and 113073, which are the only patches
>which change /usr/include/sys/fs/ufs_fs.h.
>113457 seems to have been withdrawn and superseded by 113073, which is
>a member of the Solaris 9 recommended patch cluster. This 113073 patch
>is a comprehensive UFS and LVM patch.
>See, here our Solaris 9 boxes have S9 4/04 installed on them. The
>Solaris 9 box exhibiting the problems had the recommended cluster
>applied, which included 113073-13. We have another Solaris 9 box which
>is running AFS fine which has 113073-05 installed.
>So it seems that somewhere after at least rev 05 of patch 113073 is
>when sun "broke" UFS as far as what AFS expects, and the kernel patches
>have no part in this.
>Reading through the release history for the 113073 patch, nothing
>immediately sticks out as the cause of why 1) fs_interleave was removed
>from ufs_fs.h, and 2) why vfsck now has issues with block 0 of a UFS
>Can you check your S9 system for me and tell me what rev of 113073 you
>have installed, if it is installed?
>OpenAFS-info mailing list
Renata Dart | renata@SLAC.Stanford.edu
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center |
2575 Sand Hill Road, MS 97 | (650) 926-2848 (office)
Stanford, California 94025 | (650) 926-3329 (fax)