[OpenAFS] Re: Problems with reiserfs when start OpenAFS 1.2.11-fc1 Segmentation fault with kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl

Ryan Underwood nemesis-lists@icequake.net
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:18:46 -0600


--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:46:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> jds wrote:
> >Hi Ryan:
> >
> >   Thanks for your help, the client openafs working again.
> >
> >loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
> >Journalled Block Device driver loaded
> >kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> >EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.19, 19 August 2002 on loop(7,0), internal journal
> >EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
>=20
> No, if you're going to be stacking filesystems, use ext2, not ext3.  You=
=20
> will get better performance, and there's no use in having two levels of=
=20
> journaling in this case.

You might also think about bigger than 100MB cache file.  A big cache
helps out AFS client performance tremendously.  But definitely use ext2
and not ext3 as others have said.

--=20
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis@icequake.net>

--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARthWIonHnh+67jkRAs00AJ47zXHzxuU1PGEA00jfABvlrZzhhACfaTyz
DYTjd3+VHSf8k+AkjcIMz/8=
=MYcl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--