[OpenAFS] Re: Problems with reiserfs when start OpenAFS 1.2.11-fc1 Segmentation fault with kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl
ted creedon
tcreedon@easystreet.com
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:22:46 -0800
Ditto, ext3 works fine on SuSE 9.0 boxes, 250 Gig.
Correct me if I'm wrong but ext2 runs fsck which takes a long time on large
partitions, ext3 is fairly quick on boot up/down.
Tedc
-----Original Message-----
From: openafs-info-admin@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-admin@openafs.org]
On Behalf Of Dj Merrill
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:00 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Problems with reiserfs when start OpenAFS
1.2.11-fc1 Segmentation fault with kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl
Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
> Thus spake Pete Walters (pete@deek.org):
>
>
>>Are there known problems with having your cache on an ext3 partition
>>instead of ext2?
>
>
> I'm using ext3 for months without a single problem.
>
Ditto.
-Dj
--
Dj Merrill Thayer School of Engineering
ThUG Sr. Unix Systems Administrator 8000 Cummings Hall
deej@thayer.dartmouth.edu - N1JOV Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
"On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section,
it said 'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux." -Anonymous
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info