> Both of these results make sense. What doesn't make sense to me is > why afsd is deciding to trim the cache when only about 8000 of the V > files have been populated. I just finished the same test with a chunksize of 20 (twice the original), and the same situation occurs, except only 8000 of the V files are populated. It seems as if there's some sort of cap at 4.5 gigs... Wes