[OpenAFS] Re: [possibly dumb question] volume must occupy entire OS-level
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:02:10 -0800
Jeffrey Hutzelman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> - With the inode-based fileserver, it is safe to put non-AFS files in
> a vice partition, but having multiple /vicep* on the same physical
> filesystem would be bad, and could well lead to filesystem corruption
> (not so much during operation as during a salvage). So, it just won't
> let you do that. With a namei server, there is no such concern, and
> you can create /vicepx/AlwaysAttach and the partition will be attached
> even though it is not a filesystem root.
Jeff, thanks for responding. The rest of your response (and the
others) made sense and were really helpful.
Regarding the paragraph above, I know what inodes are and the point of
the namei() system call, but I wasn't aware that AFS fileserver
instances came in two "flavors" with these names, or their exact
meaning in this particular context (though I can take a guess).
Can you point me to further documentation on this administrative
decision and its implementation consequences?
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380
Q: "Won't the pendulum swing back?"
A: "It has never been a pendulum. Think tectonic plates instead."
-- from patrick.net