[OpenAFS] Documentation project comments

[Esther Filderman]

On 6/10/05, ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com> wrote:
> For what its worth, I think html documentation with hyperlinks is not the
> best way to go. It just happened to get done first on the second round of
> conversions.

Yes, you've made your bias clear since you started this. While I
sincerely appreciate your effort, we MUST have documentation that's
available online.  Requiring people to download giant postscript or
pdf files to look up one command is ludicrious.

Making things look pretty is fine, but they also have to be usable.=20
In the end, HTML is likely going to be the most used.