[OpenAFS] OpenAFS in a production environment

Derrick J Brashear shadow@dementia.org
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:28:31 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Lester Barrows wrote:

> I can only go into so much detail about our configuration for various reasons,
> but I'd be happy to do what I can in the future. My statement that the
> developers are not interested in a solution for the NAT issue however comes
> from the recurring anti-NAT response seen several times in the past on this
> list when these issues have come up. I won't argue the point any further,
> however the particular statement you pulled out was intended to be taken in
> context of the statement which directly followed.

NAT sucks. I'd like to solve the NAT problem by taking it out back and 
shooting it. But failing that I'd like a solution which is usable today.