[OpenAFS] Re: is there any good reason to use capialized names for new
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:02:23 -0800
Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
> Hm, I'm not sure that anything like that *could* exist. The RFCs are
> concerned with the on-the-wire protocol; locally configured mappings would
> be outside their scope. MIT Kerberos and Heimdal are different
> implementations that could well use different logic. Shishi is yet
> another implementation with its own logic. Microsoft might do something
> I don't think this is the kind of area where you are going to get that
> sort of document.
This keeps reminding me of the Bad Old Days of hosts.txt before we had
DNS... Manually distributing mapping files just isn't the way to go...