[OpenAFS] Re: why afs backup is so poorly supported
Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:37:11 -0700
Derrick J Brashear <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Adam Megacz wrote:
>> You're not the only one drooling over this possibility. But it won't
>> help much with the current namei/AFSIDat layout.
> What problem do you have with it? It emulates open-by-inode-number
> with some metadata in the mode bits, basically.
> That's oversimplification but it was designed to be efficient.
Sorry for the confusion. It's not the way the layout is done, but
that it is done at all.
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380