[OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270408

Mircea Ciocan mircea.ciocan@cmosvision.com
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:17:59 +0200


Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Mircea Ciocan
> <mircea.ciocan@cmosvision.com> wrote:
>   
>> Derrick Brashear wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Mircea Ciocan
>>> <mircea.ciocan@cmosvision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Derrick Brashear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Ted Creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> OpenAFS crashed my 8 processor Intel i7 using 16% of one cpu and 100%
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> single processor system too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is time consuming due to the cold boots and the reset
>>>>>> button...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Are you running 1.4.10? (The correct answer is yes. If you give the
>>>>> wrong answer, fix it and try again)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Yes, I'm running this on an OpenSUSE 11.1 x64:
>>>> openafs-authlibs-1.4.10-13.2
>>>> openafs-1.4.10-13.2
>>>> openafs-client-1.4.10-13.2
>>>> openafs-server-1.4.10-13.2
>>>> openafs-kmp-default-1.4.10_2.6.27.21_0.1-13.2
>>>> openafs-krb5-mit-1.4.10-13.2
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, no matter what kerberos key
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> The kerberos key isn't causing the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>>  b..s is happening this should not produce
>>>> this miserable kernel loop that kills the most powerful machines
>>>> available
>>>> today, it either should have some slower cadence so that eventually some
>>>> could stop the AFS processes or it should give up after some time, I this
>>>> regard I consider this behavior a bug.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> it probably is.
>>>
>>> dumb question: are you using dynroot?
>>>
>>>       
>> Actually yes, I do, and it works like a charm, is that bad now ?!?!?!?
>>     
>
> sure. it means you're starting afs with no servers available to serve root.afs.
>
> it's a bug. there's a ticket open for it. but it's easily avoidable:
> don't do that.
>   

 Oh well, fashion changes, some while ago NOT USING dynroot was bad and 
obsolete, now is vice-versa ;), good to know that this was what was 
causing it
but then again dynroot is quite convenient, I hope the bug gets fixed 
sometime.
 Thank you Derrick for your quick and informed answers, you're a life 
savior for us not so gurus in the matter :).

 Best regards,
 Mircea