[OpenAFS] openafs on Fedora 12?
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:05:36 -0500
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
> In message <email@example.com>,=
> k Brashear writes:
>>Allowing N chunks with M chunksize configured, where N*M is greater
>>than the cache size you configured seems entirely reasonable: not
>>every chunk will be filled.
> but they could be. =A0at which point afs breaks and the user will have a
> poor experience with afs -- "afs sucks".
why could they be? or rather, why does it need to work that way? i
don't see why we'd promise it being possible, or why it would need to