[OpenAFS] Does 1.5.57 work on debian etch(linux 2.6.18.6)?
原幸人
yukihito.hara623@gmail.com
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:55:51 +0900
--000325574746d0871704643fac68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> 3.Get openafs source(1.5.57) and extract it.
>
>unless you're doing development or want the features in 1.5.x, 1.4.8
>is the stable, recommended version. why'd you choose 1.5.57?
This is just my mistake.
I'm quit a begginer about OpenAFS,
So I thought packaged and suggestion version is 1.4.8,
and 1.5.x can be able to work if I were compile it from source.
Now I'm trying 1.4.8, without kernel's AFS support.
>> mount -t AFS /afs afs
>
>won't work.
I see.
I thought AFS is a pseud file system like procfs or sysfs.
That's why I tried to mount AFS like proc or sysfs.
Thank you for your advicing!
Yukihito HARA
--000325574746d0871704643fac68
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> 3.Get openafs source(1.5.57) and extract it.<br>
><br>
>unless you're doing development or want the features in 1.5.x, 1.4.8<br>>is the stable, recommended version. why'd you choose 1.5.57?<br><br>This is just my mistake.<br>I'm quit a begginer about OpenAFS, <br>
So I thought packaged and suggestion version is 1.4.8, <br>and 1.5.x can be able to work if I were compile it from source.<br><br>Now I'm trying 1.4.8, without kernel's AFS support.<br><br><br>
>> mount -t AFS /afs afs<br>
><br>
>won't work.<br><br>I see.<br>I thought AFS is a pseud file system like procfs or sysfs.<br>That's why I tried to mount AFS like proc or sysfs.<br><br><br>Thank you for your advicing!<br><br><br>Yukihito HARA<br>
<br><br>
--000325574746d0871704643fac68--