[OpenAFS] Volume replication

[Anders Magnusson]

Jean Praloran wrote:
> I performed an fs examine, because fs lq is for quota.
>
>
> Here is the output :
>
>
> root.cell :
>
> afs-2 /afs/epitech.net <http://epitech.net> # fs examine
> File . (536870916.1.1) contained in volume 536870916
> Volume status for vid = 536870916 named root.cell.readonly
> Current disk quota is unlimited
> Current blocks used are 18882
> The partition has 813060455 blocks available out of 863664762
>
>
>
> volume also replicated :
> afs-2 /afs/epitech.net/site <http://epitech.net/site> # fs examine
> File . (536895547.1.1) contained in volume 536895547
> Volume status for vid = 536895547 named site
> Current disk quota is unlimited
> Current blocks used are 417442
> The partition has 800307515 blocks available out of 863664762
>
citron:/afs/epitech.net/site >fs exam
File . (536895548.1.1) contained in volume 536895548
Volume status for vid = 536895548 named site.readonly
Current disk quota is unlimited
Current blocks used are 417442
The partition has 781905331 blocks available out of 863664762

...which is as it should look like I assume.  Have you issued "fs 
checkvolumes" on the
machine where there you only get rw volumes?

-- Ragge



>
> The root.cell give me the ro Volume while the other one give me the RW 
> volume
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Felix Frank <Felix.Frank@desy.de 
> <mailto:Felix.Frank@desy.de>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, 7 May 2009, Jean Praloran wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I have a volume which is replicated on several servers. I have
>         run some
>         tests (basically tcpdump) and noticed that my client where
>         asking only the
>         RW volume and never the RO, so my replication is kind of
>         useless. For others
>         volumes such as root.cell there is no problem, does anybody
>         have and idea of
>         what could happend ?
>
>
>     Hello,
>
>     make sure that the volume that contains the mountpoint of the
>     volume in question here is not mounted RW (and that it is, in
>     fact, replicated).
>     A broken read-only-path is likely the issue here.
>
>     Use fs lq to quickly find out just which volume (RO or RW) is
>     accessed at any point in your AFS tree.
>
>     HTH
>      - Felix
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Praloran Jean